Anti-Drugged Driving At Societal Risk

Prompted by “NIDA and drugged driving”:

My comment therein shared with you herein fwiw…

They’re just trying to get their prohibition fix, and it’s all they got at best in their attempt to get there.

What they’re not doing is justifying prohibition by coming out with their “See! We told you so!” infographic showing all of the disasters they proclaimed would happen upon “weakening” drug laws.

After all, such “weakening” has amply occurred over the past few decades with no credible evidence to support such disaster (because prohibition never actually worked), despite strictly political posturing to the contrary.

Montana Republican dominance effectively overturned voter approval for medical cannabis, merely because we’re all supposed to assume that cannabis legality is harmful without experimental science and empirical data to do anything but counter that assumption — with the mainstream media exercising their typically seriously biased (so journalistically unethical) neglect on the matter.

Rush Limbaugh broadcasted his opposition for sustaining cannabis legality in Colorado, solely on the basis that someone there (I assume a Republican politician there) says it was a big mistake.

Outrageously pitiful are the only two words to describe the effort to keep the prohibition fix going.

Outrageously pitiful would be the ignorance of the prompt need for a public intervention, so sanctioned thugs can no longer be sanctioned, but can get the help they need for public safety. Such intervention could include the prohibitionist “treatment” mindset, so those thugs would get their help by ending up behind bars for rights infringement (an actually harmful and illegal result they caused as a group against millions of actually-innocent people).

Thankfully, the public is increasingly understanding that reefer madness has been law madness all along.

I'm an honest freak (or reasonably responsibly balanced "misfit", if you prefer) of an entertainer working and resting as my careful contribution to help improve society. Too many people abuse reasoning (e.g. 'partial truth = whole truth' scam), while I exercise reason to explore and express whole truth without any conflict-of-interest.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Liberty Shield, Stress Health

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

a couple of images of yours truly "There are some things so serious you have to laugh at them." – Niels Bohr

Feel free to join us in seamlessly riding our boundless community waves.

Fun through serious, my carefully formed results are honest and usually offer a freshly unique view.

As a fairly complex person, I cover many interests, so for your convenience, I separate them into "RSS-able" branches...

Follow Spirit Wave Journal on
Thank You
To those of you making up the number in the box above (and informal followers elsewhere -- e.g. tapping into my RSS feeds here), I thank you for your undeniably necessary role for (and as part of) my beloved 3Fs (family, friends, and fans).
Help Needed

Helping raise awareness and any other constructive way to participate in our growing community is equally appreciated.

Legal Disclaimer
Spirit Wave ("entertainer" herein) disclaims that entertainer only publicly posts content ("entertainment" herein) for entertainment purposes only. You (the reader of this sentence) agree to the fullest extent permissible by law that entertainer is not liable for any damage. Moreover, entertainer never advocates breaking the law, so any expression involving drug use is addressed solely to anyone capable of lawfully engaging in that use. Since this journal is a part of the All Sines entertainment ecosystem, you (the reader of this sentence) agree to be bound by the All Sines legal disclaimer located @
%d bloggers like this: