Cannabis Saturation

Prompted by “Big Government-Supported Study Finds No Evidence That Medical Marijuana Laws Encourage Teenagers to Smoke Pot”: http://reason.com/blog/2015/06/16/big-government-supported-study-finds-no

When I say Certain Drug Prohibition is an abject failure, I’m not exaggerating, so these kinds of statistics that for many years have never coincided with judicial application never surprise me.

Cannabis is not an automatic feel-good drug. By musical comparison, if you want to relax, you probably have a much better chance of achieving that result with certain classical, soft rock, ambient pieces (etc.) Blaring death metal until your ears bleed (for prime example) probably negates relaxation, and the same principle basically applies to cannabis.

If a user lawfully selects a “wreck” strain (or I’m guessing a strain such as “Pit Bull”, etc.), slams a few (or several) bong hits, then the psychological situation of that user may end up challenging for worst through best (some people are comforted by edgy effects, while others find varying degrees of mental discomfort — the latter never being a problem with automatic painkillers, which is a very key-yet-insufficiently-mentioned distinction effectively demanding drug class separation for educational — so publicly healthful — accuracy).

If a user lawfully selects a righteously grown “Grandaddy Purple” strain, keeps the electronic vaporizer at roughly 370 degrees, then that user probably tunes in with relaxation.

As popular and wonderful as the strain named “Blue Dream” is, the dream effect likely prompting the name may not be appreciated by everyone.

My point is cannabis can be highly nuanced (there are virtually an infinite set of options for psychological styling), so requires proper strain selection (including possible combination) to achieve a positive psychological net result fit for set and setting (cannabis is a psychedelic and its use is a skill).

As cannabis also avoids being a virus, people avoid it for basically the same reasons people avoid skydiving, roller coasters, etc. Prohibition too often negatively impacts the quality of the experience (as anyone with access to a nice dispensary can clearly attest), but does not squash demand or black market supply by any solid measure. Prohibition merely (and outrageously) puts illicit drug users at (a perhaps much higher) risk against public safety.

In economic terms, market saturation has been achieved with respect to illicit drugs, so I remain confident that legality (with the word-of-mouth naturally spreading outwards in the form of explanations of actual risks and rewards) would not change usage statistics — e.g. not a whole lot of people would run to the store to legally buy a 250+ microgram dose of LSD, if they truly understood the experience (probably just a ‘skydiver sized’ group). Salvia divinorum is a legal drug in many states (and even federally here) that supports my Market Saturation theory.

The mainstream public simply assumes prohibition works to at least some degree (our community leaders continue to insist upon sustaining it for tens of billions of precious taxpayer dollars annually, after all), so legality equals increased use (and abuse). That baseless assumption must be first addressed by repealing rights-infringing drug laws (a process already torturously, but effectively, occurring without prohibitionists capable of validating their dire prediction of disaster), before entertainers (i.e. good educators necessarily using entertainment for student interest) can properly reach out and educate the public about the true risks and rewards of any form of intentional perception alteration without fear of prosecution.

We’ve come a tragically long way from a nation ignited in violent revolutionary turmoil against law abuse to ‘law is always good for us’ (clearly proven by the ‘regulate and tax’ crowd sadly dominating the legality scene).

If law abuse (i.e. prohibition addiction — including the equally questionable textured prohibition in the form of rights-infringing regulations) does not face proper public intervention, then the horrific damage of prohibition will continue to apply heavy amounts of unhealthy stress — the actual cause of drug abuse (not drug availability) — against public safety.

I'm an honest freak (or reasonably responsibly balanced "misfit", if you prefer) of an entertainer working and resting as my careful contribution to help improve society. Too many people abuse reasoning (e.g. 'partial truth = whole truth' scam), while I exercise reason to explore and express whole truth without any conflict-of-interest.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Liberty Shield, Respect Cannabis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Welcome
a couple of images of yours truly "There are some things so serious you have to laugh at them." – Niels Bohr

Feel free to join us in seamlessly riding our boundless community waves.

Fun through serious, my carefully formed results are honest and usually offer a freshly unique view.

As a fairly complex person, I cover many interests, so for your convenience, I separate them into "RSS-able" branches...

Follow Spirit Wave Journal on WordPress.com
Thank You
To those of you making up the number in the box above (and informal followers elsewhere -- e.g. tapping into my RSS feeds here), I thank you for your undeniably necessary role for (and as part of) my beloved 3Fs (family, friends, and fans).
Help Needed

Helping raise awareness and any other constructive way to participate in our growing community is equally appreciated.

Legal Disclaimer
Spirit Wave ("entertainer" herein) disclaims that entertainer only publicly posts content ("entertainment" herein) for entertainment purposes only. You (the reader of this sentence) agree to the fullest extent permissible by law that entertainer is not liable for any damage. Moreover, entertainer never advocates breaking the law, so any expression involving drug use is addressed solely to anyone capable of lawfully engaging in that use. Since this journal is a part of the All Sines entertainment ecosystem, you (the reader of this sentence) agree to be bound by the All Sines legal disclaimer located @ http://allsines.life/legal-disclaimer
%d bloggers like this: