Terror on Drugs

It’s all energy (at least according to mainstream physics), so the notion that problems and solutions objectively exist is laughable.

That laughter stops upon that energy including the experience of suffering, but that stoppage fails to defy that problematic (yeah, I confusingly went there) notion.

That’s the world we live in.

Problems and solutions are subjective.

Energetic pressures resonate to form opinions, which upon critical mass become ejected through expression.

While too many people base humanity at the biological level, I express via the underlying physics of humanity (a seamless and boundless flow of energy extremely extending beyond human perception). That allows for the deepest reach in identifying true suffering.

One major criticism presses against leveraging tragic events (e.g. terrorism “success”) to promote agendas. I criticize that criticism, because tragedy is where problems are born and solutions obviously arise from the rippling social discourse. To be fair, that criticism is likely intended to denounce spin against public safety, but the subjective nature of solutions places that criticism as ironically hypocritical (an agenda of its own).

Terrorism is the methodology of thuggery.

Combine thuggery with reason abuse and we apparently literally have the foundation of all of humanity’s internal problems in a nutshell.

Instead of pressing back against terror, which makes no sense (one cannot destroy fear — a fundamental emotion necessary to identify threats — without creating fear), responsibly tough people understanding the critical role of civility press back against thugs (including religious, judicial, economic, academic, and any other form of thuggery).

When reason abuse is factored in, then that press back is susceptible to ironic thuggery (e.g. law enforcement in the war on some drugs that only benefits judicial and other thugs by any concrete measure).

Certain Drug Prohibition is highly destructive, but that fact never (or insufficiently) makes the mainstream news for actually obvious reasons (necessary positive relationship with law enforcement to best secure information about the tragic events dominating news reports).

Religious thugs need resources, which usually means money. While the thuggish group deserving no mention secures (at least some) funding from oil, they (along with other thugs) can and understandably do turn to the black market involving illegal drugs, because of the obscenely huge profit margin therein.

Ending the war on some drugs that has failed to create a drug-free prison system (at significant taxpayer expense) would fairly instantly cripple a serious financial supply line for thugs of all varieties.

Consequently treating drug abuse as fundamentally a health (not criminal) issue makes flawless sense. The relevant prohibitive law dangerously threatens people engaged in illicit drug abuse, so seeking help upon the vicious cycle involving drug intake (caused by unhealthy stress, so not a wickedly chosen failure of morality under normal intellectual ability) is disastrously hampered.

Understand that vicious cycle affects the overwhelming minority of people by any statistical (and other) measure, so the idea of implementing and sustaining a powerfully destructive blanket law affecting us all is truly undeniably (and globally) insane.

The war on some drugs is clearly all about terror — the methodology of thugs.

If you support that war, you’re a terrorist by any sane definition, and all suffering resulting from drug abusers not getting the help they need, innocent civilians being ruined by religious (and other) thugs, non-violent people dragged and too often sustained through humanity’s punishment system, and all of the families and communities negatively impacted by that rippling suffering is on your pitiful, childish, and thuggish hands.

Civility demands sensible solutions, so not serious global problems disguised as solutions by thugs hypocritically lying and stealing to get their thug fix.

The war on thugs is civilized, and it begins with the keyboard being mightier than any weapon of thugs. Your sharing of this post (and/or authoring your own take) spreads that verbal press into the social discourse — the seed of all policy changes — the seed and consequently growth likely forming beyond the ability for thugs to target clearly.

I'm an honest freak (or reasonably responsibly balanced "misfit", if you prefer) of an entertainer working and resting as my careful contribution to help improve society. Too many people abuse reasoning (e.g. 'partial truth = whole truth' scam), while I exercise reason to explore and express whole truth without any conflict-of-interest.

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Liberty Shield, Respect Cannabis, Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Welcome
a couple of images of yours truly "There are some things so serious you have to laugh at them." – Niels Bohr

Feel free to join us in seamlessly riding our boundless community waves.

Fun through serious, my carefully formed results are honest and usually offer a freshly unique view.

As a fairly complex person, I cover many interests, so for your convenience, I separate them into "RSS-able" branches...

Follow Spirit Wave Journal on WordPress.com
Thank You
To those of you making up the number in the box above (and informal followers elsewhere -- e.g. tapping into my RSS feeds here), I thank you for your undeniably necessary role for (and as part of) my beloved 3Fs (family, friends, and fans).
Help Needed

Helping raise awareness and any other constructive way to participate in our growing community is equally appreciated.

Legal Disclaimer
Spirit Wave ("entertainer" herein) disclaims that entertainer only publicly posts content ("entertainment" herein) for entertainment purposes only. You (the reader of this sentence) agree to the fullest extent permissible by law that entertainer is not liable for any damage. Moreover, entertainer never advocates breaking the law, so any expression involving drug use is addressed solely to anyone capable of lawfully engaging in that use. Since this journal is a part of the All Sines entertainment ecosystem, you (the reader of this sentence) agree to be bound by the All Sines legal disclaimer located @ http://allsines.life/legal-disclaimer
%d bloggers like this: