Black Hole Dimensions

Prompted by “Physicists Theorize Out How To Retrieve Information From a Black Hole”: http://science.slashdot.org/story/15/12/23/237202/physicists-theorize-out-how-to-retrieve-information-from-a-black-hole

Black holes earn their name because their gravity is so strong not even light can escape from them. Oddly, though, physicists have come up with a bit of theoretical sleight of hand to retrieve a speck of information that’s been dropped into a black hole. The calculation touches on one of the biggest mysteries in physics: how all of the information trapped in a black hole leaks out as the black hole ‘evaporates.’ Many theorists think that must happen, but they don’t know how.

When I experience (read, watch) the results from the scientific community, forcing mysteries towards resolution with their seriously rigid definition of space is like watching someone struggling to wear a shoe that’s too small (with all due and well-earned respect to that community).

Considering there has never been even the tiniest shred of science concluding any objective distinction (Dr. Edward Witten, founder of M Theory, best described a particle as a “blur”), there also is no science concluding space is actually distinct from the energy within it.

When we examine the massive mystery that’s unperceived phenomena — e.g. dark matter, dark energy, quantum entanglement, virtual particles, gravitons, black hole information, etc. — we understand that reality enormously extends well beyond human (including technological) perception.

The only sensible conclusion is space (obviously including any of its properties — e.g. dimensionality) is purely energetic without actual distinction.

That means the shape of a black hole can modulate well beyond human perception (literally think oceanic dimensionality), and the information falling into a black hole simply modulates beyond the “singularity” (which is logically the edge of a rigid mathematical frame) along hidden dimensionality.

Importantly note that energy never settles and there’s no actual linearity, so mathematical rigidity will always have an edge of reason. For example, you could look at the following hyphen — “-” — and think it’s actually linear. If you could zoom way in upon that straightness, however, you would eventually reach a zoom depth revealing only curvature (linearity is purely subjective).

All of that eventually ties in with Reality Waveform Theory (RWT), which I healthily confidently maintain is the actual “theory of everything” the scientific community is still searching for. It’s part of my journal and conveniently freely available for anyone to read, contemplate, and preferably share.

From humanity’s core understanding, science radiates understanding itself outwards in all possible directions. Because of the purely energetic nature of reality, there’s also the purely sinusoidal nature of reality (Fourier analysis).

…one more strange property of quantum mechanics: that measurement not only reveals something about a system, it also changes its state.

There’s nothing strange about it, when you logically consider that observation (including measurement) itself is purely energetic, so has a physical and seamless impact upon the observed system.

Without any distinction, it’s critical for everyone to understand that information is also purely energetic, so you and your thoughts (intentions, focuses, efforts, avoidance, prayers, etc.) are purely energetic.

Considering RWT literally fits with all well-established scientific discoveries, the theory is perfectly logically strong.

RWT even validates the brilliant Dr. Albert Einstein’s instincts against quantum physics — without disproving quantum physics.

The wording of RWT can be challenging to read, because I meticulously refined it to fully logically say only one thing (as the scientific method clearly demands).

Instead of directly using mathematical language, I use only certainties to form the worded construct.

The English language has many words with multiple definitions potentially producing uncertainty — a violation of strictest science — so extreme care was needed to avoid that violation, which means the language can be fully understandable, but not always orthodox.

I'm an honest freak (or reasonably responsibly balanced "misfit", if you prefer) of an entertainer working and resting as my careful contribution to help improve society. Too many people abuse reasoning (e.g. 'partial truth = whole truth' scam), while I exercise reason to explore and express whole truth without any conflict-of-interest.

Tagged with: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Keep It Real

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Welcome
a couple of images of yours truly "There are some things so serious you have to laugh at them." – Niels Bohr

Feel free to join us in seamlessly riding our boundless community waves.

Fun through serious, my carefully formed results are honest and usually offer a freshly unique view.

As a fairly complex person, I cover many interests, so for your convenience, I separate them into "RSS-able" branches...

Follow Spirit Wave Journal on WordPress.com
Thank You
To those of you making up the number in the box above (and informal followers elsewhere -- e.g. tapping into my RSS feeds here), I thank you for your undeniably necessary role for (and as part of) my beloved 3Fs (family, friends, and fans).
Help Needed

Helping raise awareness and any other constructive way to participate in our growing community is equally appreciated.

Legal Disclaimer
Spirit Wave ("entertainer" herein) disclaims that entertainer only publicly posts content ("entertainment" herein) for entertainment purposes only. You (the reader of this sentence) agree to the fullest extent permissible by law that entertainer is not liable for any damage. Moreover, entertainer never advocates breaking the law, so any expression involving drug use is addressed solely to anyone capable of lawfully engaging in that use. Since this journal is a part of the All Sines entertainment ecosystem, you (the reader of this sentence) agree to be bound by the All Sines legal disclaimer located @ http://allsines.life/legal-disclaimer
%d bloggers like this: