Thank you posthumously to all members of the military who have lost their lives for public safety, and to all of their loved ones who must deal with the challenges accompanying that honorable sacrifice.
While not a warrior in the militaristic sense, as a responsible entertainer, I sometimes operate as an informational warrior (understanding that sometimes the “pen is mightier than the sword”) and risk my safety to challenge powerfully dominant conventional wisdom superficially forming the image of public safety, but demonstrably the opposite to primarily serve relatively powerful self-interests.
The result of my serious path-paving effort spanning several years and strongly counting (like working through brutally challenging terrain) is scientific constitutionalism — a seed of pure logical truth that, upon growing traction, brings the tried-and-true scientific method leveraged powerfully in technology to the area of constitutional law — so healthily growing absolute language constructs — e.g. naturally given and unalienable right to liberty — to form fair (so just) law.
The need to protect honorable members at risk of dying in combat is paramount, and that starts with improving human behavior.
That improvement cannot be coerced by elitists launching military efforts or subjectively defining risk to form liberty-infringing law, both ostensibly to protect elitist power entrenchment in the guise of public safety, but by educating society about the basics of abuse itself — especially starting with what I prefer (for lingual clarity) to call the Rule of Reality (RoR).
Not mysticism or pseudo/junk science by any measure, the RoR is a fully scientific conclusion matching reality’s need for balance to maintain its demonstrable stability.
Literally all known systems (considered living or not) from the largest through tiniest scales require balance for stability, and there is no reason to believe that reality itself (i.e. the totality of existence — logically the ultimate system of systems) is any different.
Ample scientific evidence proves that reality includes a balancing (so naturally fundamentally governing) force towards correcting abusive behavior — i.e. there can be no “free lunch” when it comes to being abusive, scientifically speaking (as opposed to mystical or religious approaches, which are easily dismissed due to disbelief).
‘Every action is an opposite and equal reaction’ is a fundamental law of physics, and a major piece of evidence supporting reality’s need for balance.
Mainstream science only supplies evidence that reveals purely an energetic reality — i.e. from humanity’s perspective, reality is an ocean of energy that seamlessly includes all of us.
The modulation of energy includes balancing, so forms another major piece of scientific evidence towards reality’s need for balance.
Prime examples of the purely energetic quality comes from Einstein’s most famous equation (proving mass is condensed energy — as basically demonstrated by a nuclear explosion), particle/wave duality in quantum physics (i.e. particles act as waves), and string theory (a prominent theory stating a particle is a modulating string of energy).
Moreover, and unfortunately unpopularly, there has never been any objectively proven boundary, so any boundary is subjective — hardcore scientifically speaking — while the mental processes forming that subjectivity logically remain purely energetic.
Pain is ultimately energy.
Pleasure is ultimately energy.
Domination is ultimately energy.
What too many people still fail to learn due to lacking education, or a preference for the “liberty” to be ignorant, is ‘suffering out’ is ‘suffering in’ (and ‘dominance out’ is ‘dominance in’) within a balancing reality, so nobody gets away with murder (for prime example) — regardless of escaping humanity’s punishment system.
In other words, if you cannot handle being the metaphorical sheep, then do not be the metaphorical wolf, because domination is always spent and solely paid for by being dominated in strict accordance with reality’s need for balance — regardless of cleverness and/or such.
Time has been repeatedly experimentally proven to be a dimension of space. To the extent that we move within familiar three-dimensional space is the extent that we slow down in time (the fourth spatial dimension) — again with major posthumous thanks to the brilliant Dr. Albert Einstein.
For spatial consistency, that must mean that all time exists simultaneously as the only moment that actually exists, which is this one.
Full mental rest (what too many people erroneously conclude as “ignorance is bliss” in this case) is the sensation of that oneness — the ultimate peace due to the absence of literally any possible opponent.
That sensation is also synonymous with supreme composure, and we all (at least should) know that composure is (at least basically) required for competence.
All possible future and past experiences are happening now, so while an abusive person may not feel balancing suffering due to perceiving time as a flow, the resulting impact is actually simultaneous and relatively ripples (i.e. without time as a flow, curves) inevitable justice within reality.
Abuse is ironically a compensation mechanism against unhealthy stress (as opposed to healthy stress from a positive workout), and we all engage in abuse due to the inevitable imperfection within reality.
Fortunate people understand the RoR, so understand the need to most promptly adapt upon their abusive exercise.
Otherwise, the recklessly careless belief in escaping the suffering of abuse payment is like children sadly foolishly watching the ocean deeply recede and dancing around happily upon the wet recently exposed land. Meanwhile, the wise understand the looming tidal wave of correction, and conduct their lives in a manner to minimize that correction (immediately seek higher ground) — so responsibly suffer upfront to minimize their abusive ways, and learn a valuable lot in the process, while also forming opportunities to earn credibility (which is obviously essential for survival).
Abuse itself never ends, but presents the prime choice for each one of us throughout our lives.
The ‘lemons to lemonade’ approach is my preference, and it matches the righteous need to understand that abuse is an opportunity for humanity’s progress — e.g. my abuse prompts my involvement in helping other people better manage abuse throughout posterity.
I draw a firm (albeit subjective) distinction between responsible toughness and thuggery.
The latter opposes civility, while the former understands that civility is critical towards at least their line of work. Civility is needed for science and technology to thrive, and that results in better protection for anyone on the front lines of violent encounters.
In short, better civility means more lives are saved in military circles and beyond.
No future moment ends reality, as confirmed simply by experience — i.e. if reality dies in the future, then reality cannot occur now, as time is factually spatial. That is another reason why the RoR is logically supreme in its inevitability.
Death in a seamlessly energetic existence is not scientifically confirmed to be the end of experiencing the boundless reality (at least to the furthest reach of the scientific method during the authoring of this sentence).
Death is therefore subjective (even if agreed upon by all of humanity — i.e. humanity’s net-resulting subjectivity), and ultimately death by any definition is energy.
Energy is not just a resource to power technology, but the entirety of existence from humanity’s perception and beyond.
Energy efficiency is not limited to technological processes, but literally everything involving survival and “thrival”.
Abuse is equal to energy inefficiency, so progress becomes tied to energy efficiency — i.e. stress management (using the physics definition of stress, which is synonymous with change, while importantly noting that change is ultimately energy).
Logically the worst form of abuse due at least to its mainly broad scope of destruction is the abuse of law — the form of abuse that our nation was established against, according to our most famous national declaration.
Yet law abuse is rampant these days, because too many people refuse to acknowledge the serious costs associated with granting our community leaders the authority to judicially manage risk — which is undeniably irreconcilable with a genuinely unalienable right to liberty (which is logically supposed to be judicially protected via the tragically unpopular ninth constitutional amendment, even despite the obvious and illegal judicial disarming of that critical catchall amendment).
In short, to define risk is to unavoidably define liberty against the unalienable property of that fundamental right, which is supposed to be unacceptable, nationally speaking.
With such a critical fundamental right, risk must remain solely within the area of education, while law is leveraged to addressed maximally conclusively (not subjectively, nor weakly scientifically) defined harm.
Live and let live is an inherent part of that key right without discrimination, yet the entire duration of our history is littered with judicially sanctioned discrimination even upon absurd grounds (e.g. skin color, gender, sexual orientation, recreational drug choice, and whatever non-rights-infringing else that I may be missing offhand).
As the past is happening now, and mental thoughts ripple inclusively through time, I offer my best positivity for all of the honorable people throughout all wars (past, present, and, if tragically needed, future) with the understanding that a seamlessly energetic reality means that they all come (actually, they all are) home safely.