The beauty of the scientific method is logical conclusions cannot be righteously denied, even if the source is unconventional (e.g. yours truly).
It all starts with the fact that no objective boundary has ever been discovered in the roughly 3,000 years of the scientific method.
Quantum physics concludes that particles are blurry, so no hard boundary exists between them.
Physics tells us that reality is purely energetic — e.g. Einstein’s most famous equation basically concludes that mass is highly condensed energy. Space will be covered later herein.
Reality being purely energetic sensibly reveals why there is no objective boundary (i.e. energy currents obviously have no such boundary).
By removing any objective particulate boundary within a purely energetic reality, particle/wave duality cannot make sense.
When particles are understood to be relative energetic resonances — so still waves (no duality) — in a purely energetic reality, the scientifically famous double-slit experiment thankfully finally makes perfect sense.
By that logic, the physicality of observation (however it is defined) is energy, and based upon the double-slit experiment, observational energy resonates to form particle energy.
In other words, the absence of observation leaves particles flowing as currents of energy through the double slits to form an interference pattern (like water flowing through those two slits). But observation of any sufficient kind resonates with those particles, so they behave as expected even at our common scale of existence.
When you observe your hand or any other area of reality, that observation resonates those particles to behave in a manner that meets your sensible expectations, so no more oddity involving the double-slit experiment.
Moving on, there is simply the oneness of reality, and scientists can do nothing with that result, other than meditate upon it.
Therefore boundaries are scientifically leveraged, which is fine — as long as scientists understand that boundaries are subjective and inevitably deviate from reality.
A purely energetic reality is a purely sinusoidal reality, as demonstrated by the well-established Fourier theorem (i.e. any complex waveform can be broken down purely into a seamless set of sinusoidal currents).
A purely sinusoidal reality is a purely logical reality, so the unfortunately excessively popular idea that reality’s overwhelming complexity within itself is a sound basis to (inclusively passionately, if not violently) uphold irrational conclusions is now sensibly voided completely into the realm of mental problems worthy of deep societal concern.
The scientific evidence only shows that the sine wave is the sole pattern of reality, so science is ultimately about sinusoidal shaping — an area where theorists dealing with M Theory (and so on) are already unwittingly operating.
To instantly appreciate the unimaginable challenge that scientists face in sinusoidal shaping, simply observe your situation. Obviously the amount and style of particle resonances within your vicinity is overwhelming upon sufficient scrutiny. Countless particles are there forming highly complicated outcomes (including your perception), so you begin to understand that sinusoidal shaping of the human vicinity is terribly challenging work that will keep scientists busy throughout posterity (kind of like forever zooming deeper into a computer-generated fractal).
The absence of relativity at the scale of the oneness of reality due to the absence of any objective boundary means that reality has no definition, because definition requires relativity.
So reality can only be currently scientifically concluded to be an undefinable extreme (or equal such).
There is another way relying solely upon mainstream scientific logic to reinforce that conclusion.
Balance is inherent within stability — which I hypothesize is due to balance being more frequent in a sine wave (i.e. a sine wave cycle has a negative peak, a positive peak, and three balancing peaks).
No known system is unbalanced yet stable, and science in effect refuses to even suggest the possibility of unbalanced stability.
That includes reality itself as logically the system of all systems.
Reality equals all possibilities.
A stable reality equals the balance of all possibilities.
The balance of all energetic possibilities inevitably includes phase inversion (i.e. what goes up in waveforms instead goes down and vice versa), which ultimately leaves us with the supreme version of phase cancellation (i.e. equal-but-opposing waves cancel each other out), so reality is an undefinable extreme.
Note that phase cancellation makes sense instead of destructive interference (which is the physics term), because the result of that supreme “destruction” is reality.
Time has been repeatedly experimentally proven to be a dimension of space, so while humanity perceives the passage of time, science reveals that time is actually one spatial moment (this one).
Experience itself concludes that reality cannot be destroyed, because if reality is destroyed in a future place, then we could not be experiencing this, as time is spatial (that destruction would span all time and eliminate experience itself).
So reality’s stability is permanent in the only actual moment (again, this one), and is the logical supremacy.
Any area within reality that challenges that stability is subjectively doomed, which is why we die (and so on).
However, critically note that as reality is one without boundary, the objective “you” (or anyone and/or anything else) is synonymous with reality. That is hypothetically why you have the sensation of having a soul (you objectively are the indestructible totality of existence). Reality is equal to the soul, so there is logically only one soul that binds literally everyone and everything.
Progress is always subjective, because there is no way to progress reality’s literally perfect stability.
Everything within reality is solely governed by that stability.
Math cannot be the base of the theory of everything (i.e. there is no equation that generates reality), because math requires boundaries, which inevitably conflicts with reality’s undefinable extremeness.
Another way to look at the limits of mathematical reach is a purely sinusoidal reality means no objective linearity. Any rigidity (so a linear construct) is merely subjective (i.e. a very lengthy sinusoidal current that merely appears straight, like the Earth’s horizon appearing straight upon a casual glance). As math is inherently rigid, inevitably that rigidity becomes problematic against reality’s pure sinusoidal curvature.
However, math can be refined to reveal more complexity of sinusoidal shaping within the human vicinity, which naturally leads to advancements in technology and so on.
Without any objective boundary, space can only be scientifically concluded to be energy.
It would not surprise me, if someone extended Einstein’s most famous equation basically from ‘energy = mass’ to ‘energy = mass = space’.
As space is energy, the properties of space modulate in all possible ways.
As of this authoring, there are three familiar spatial dimensions, the fourth dimension that is time, and the mathematical necessity for more dimensions to make the well-established equations of relativity and quantum physics fit together.
When we understand that dimensionality is energy without any boundary, we understand that dimensionality is basically oceanic due to the absence of any rigidity associated with any limit (including the number of dimensions relative to humanity).
As an audio sculptor, I often demonstrate the complexity of spatial energy via many meticulously sculpted spatial parameters. Everything that comes out of your speakers is energy, and that includes the results from reverberation and other spatial effects commonly used throughout music publication to create a musically likeable sense of space.
The three dominant spatial dimensions relative to humanity are dominant spatial energy currents (ultimately curved, despite their linear presentation to the contrary), while time is relatively a lesser dominant current, which is hypothetically why the brain evolved differently with respect to time.
Revealing more spatial complexity within the human vicinity is a powerfully major area of scientific and technological advancement — one that apparently has humanity modulating instantly to reach vast distances.
There is significantly more detail in my fairly brief document titled “Reality Waveform Theory” (freely accessible at rwave.life — which simply redirects to a page conveniently available at this journal).
Reality Waveform Theory answers the basic questions of reality itself in a purely logical way that literally fits all experimentally confirmed science.
In other words, the basics (i.e. the what, why, where, when, and how) of reality itself are truly basic, even despite the unimaginably overwhelming complexity within reality.
Humanity now has access to those basics for an unprecedented grounding to strengthen our stability as a species and individually within our species.
In addition to the aforementioned bringing of common sense to the double-slit experiment, Reality Waveform Theory validates Einstein’s instincts against quantum physics, without sacrificing the experimentally validated aspect of quantum physics.
The theory is written meticulously in a way that strictly adheres to solely leveraging certainty within the English language, so every bit as purely logical as anything mathematical.
To encourage proper scientific scrutiny of the aforementioned conclusions and Reality Waveform Theory overall, this post will repeat annually on March 14 — Pi Day (which also happens to be Dr. Albert Einstein’s birthday) — with refinement or retraction, if appropriate.
The ramifications of Reality Waveform Theory are powerfully serious with respect to humanity. We will not explore them in depth within this post, but optionally reserve them for reverberating posts decorating this annual pulse.
In short, Reality Waveform Theory at least allows us to understand the ultimate absence of multiple egos (we are all energetically one with a literally interminable reality), the consequent logical removal of the fear of death due to reality’s permanent stability and the aforementioned oneness, the understanding that control and freewill (however defined) are energy, and the understanding that nobody can intelligently believe in the possibility of getting away with corruption.
That last one is due to reality’s balancing need for stability. In other words, dominance is always spent and fully paid for via an equal counter-dominance, as dominance is energy.
So do not be the hunter, unless you can be the hunted in equal measure, for example.
Spending dominance wisely to minimize counter-dominant suffering apparently leads to a dramatically positive change in human behavior — e.g. logically discouraging greed and other unhealthy power grabs applying unbearable dominance against way too many beings.
When everyone understands the balancing counter-dominance inevitably applied by the unstoppable supremacy of reality, those power-hungry people are genuinely and intelligently (so no longer just religiously) pitied — and no power-hungry individual can stand being righteously and seriously pitied, because that completely defies the very nature of power-hunger.
That scientifically validated understanding improves humanity’s balance and therefore health, both collectively and individually.
While I disabled comments in Reality Waveform Theory, your mutually constructive comments regarding that theory and/or this post are welcome here, as is sharing this post to preferably join the righteous quest to scientifically improve posterity.
Thank you for any support provided.
And yes, I am sometimes conflicted over the number of times that I use the word purely in this post, but each time I consider removing any of them, it feels misfitting. I suppose when logically exploring reality, ample purity is inevitable.